Working Papers


VIEW POST

View more

Epistémologie de la Traduction Juridique: la construction progressive des notions pénales

By on 23 Gennaio, 2017

Tous les traducteurs juridiques, quelque soit leurs époque, en sont conscients : il n’est pas possible de traduire sans comparer.
Dans ce cadre, il faut identifier le sens de la notion objet de transposition dans le contexte du procès pénal, tout en explorant son polymorphisme sémantique jusqu’à son noyaux ontologique profond….


VIEW POST

View more

Beware the Trolldom: Speculative Interests and Policy Implications behind the Circulation of Damage Claims

By on 12 Gennaio, 2017

Moving from the evaluations operated by Richard Posner in his judgment on the case Carhart v. Halaska, the paper seeks to analyse the so-called “litigation troll” phenomenon and the development of a damage claims market, i.e. a market in which the right to propose claims is voluntary exchangeable for…


VIEW POST

View more

Brexit Means Brexit, but What Does the Second Brexit Mean?

By , , , , , on 1 Dicembre, 2016

Our analysis takes into consideration three different time blocks: we first consider how Britain came to Brexit, how the concept of Sovereignty has been challenged by participation in the European project and how Sovereignty and its implications have led to vote. The second part of the work concerns what…


VIEW POST

View more

L’elezione del Presidente degli Stati Uniti in un’America polarizzata

By on 24 Ottobre, 2016

Le primarie presidenziali statunitensi del 2016 hanno segnato l’inizio di una fase del tutto inedita nella politica americana. I candidati dei due maggiori partiti, Hillary Rodham Clinton, per il Partito Democratico, e Donald J. Trump, per il Partito Repubblicano, rappresentano figure per certi versi innovative, ma allo stesso tempo…


VIEW POST

View more

The decision-making process of European constitutional courts. A comparative perspective

By on 13 Ottobre, 2016

Mathilde Cohen, in her study on supreme and constitutional courts’ organizational cultures, hypothesised that there is a reciprocal influence between a court’s institutional design and the style of its opinions. I share her hypothesis. Thus, before exploring the practice of judicial dissent, I address its institutional and procedural contexts, since…

Archivio Working Papers
Email Subscription
Coordinamento
Andrea Buratti, Giuseppe Martinico, Oreste Pollicino, Giorgio Repetto, Raffaele Torino