Il nuovo ruolo dei genitori nella tutela della vulnerabilità digitale dei minori: spunti di comparazione giuridica tra UE, USA, Italia e Australia

This paper analyses, through a comparative study, the role of parents in protecting minors’ digital vulnerability in the EU, the US, Italy and Australia. While the EU in its fragmented framework of regulations on the subject (and in particular in the Digital Services Act) does not provide very detailed provisions for the involvement of parents nor a clear role for them in the regulation of their children’s online safety, the United States, in the new KOSA bill (reintroduced in the 119th Congress), regulates in a more specific way the functions and tools available to parents for the monitoring and control of minors’ online activities. Italy, too, in some bills currently under consideration in Parliament, aims at empowering parents to ensure the safety of their children, but also takes care to prevent or limit the exploitation of the child’s image for profit or for mere recreational purposes by the parents themselves. On the contrary, Australia, through the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024, in providing for a minimum age of 16 years for access to social media, has preferred not to emphasise the parental role, thus making digital platforms responsible for the protection of minors. This article analyses the differences between different regulatory approaches to the role of the parent with a view to a possible transnational legislative harmonisation of the parental role in ensuring the safety of children in the new digital dimension.

di

L’espansione della disciplina e dei casi di applicazione dei golden powers nella dimensione europea e italiana tra crisi pandemica, eventi geopolitici e cybersecurity

The paper focuses on the expansion of the discipline and of the cases of applications of golden powers in Italy in accordance with the relevant EU guidelines. The legislation on golden powers finds its roots in the British golden share, the French action specifique and the Court of Justice of the European Union's judgments on state intervention in the economy. An expansion of the Italian dispositions on golden powers has been adopted following the Covid-19 pandemic crisis. The legislation has also been extended to the area of cybersecurity, with possible repercussion on private law as well, like an increasing control over contracting parties in specific sectors. After a preliminary overview of the state of the art in the European context, the paper also analyses the increase of concrete cases of application of golden powers in Italy, even in response to recent geopolitical events, and detects the real purposes for which, today, they are exercised.

di

Smart contract, abuso del diritto e tutela giurisdizionale: spunti di comparazione tra diritto italiano e diritto inglese

This paper sets to shed light on the issue concerning the possible abuse of rights brought about by the self-executing nature of smart contracts, whereof a number of concrete examples were hypothesised along with certain forms of judicial protection that may be devised so as to curb the prejudice resulting from the afore-mentioned digital phenomenon within the scope of a comparative perspective between Italy and England. Owing to the de facto ineliminability of the effects produced by the computer programme and the difficulties of identifying specific protections for cases where permissionless blockchain-based smart contracts could constitute an abuse of rights, a reintegrative mechanism of a patrimonial nature was originally formulated, thus enforcing already existing legal institutes in the national legal systems compared herein. However, even though the absence of the general category pertaining to the abuse of rights in the English legal tradition has hindered the development of alternative remedies to unjust enrichment and claim for damages, which seem to be applicable to abusive hypotheses even across the Channel, in Italy the essential features and the general doctrine relevant to the abuse of rights allowed the application of multiple, atypical and non-predetermined forms of judicial protection that perhaps could be viable in cases where it is deemed useful to trace the abuse of rights back to the self-executiveness of the smart contract. Lastly, although permissionless blockchain-based computer programmes were born with the specific purpose of allowing economic transactions to be carried out without a third party, such as the State, being able to intervene in the relationship or modify the effects produced by a computer protocol, this contribution underlines the enduring need for the law to continue regulating new digital phenomena through all means at its disposal.

di