The decision-making process of European constitutional courts. A comparative perspective

By on 13 Ottobre, 2016
PAROLE CHIAVE
Mathilde Cohen, in her study on supreme and constitutional courts’ organizational cultures, hypothesised that there is a reciprocal influence between a court’s institutional design and the style of its opinions. I share her hypothesis. Thus, before exploring the practice of judicial dissent, I address its institutional and procedural contexts, since these exert a profound influence on this phenomenon. For this purpose the most relevant aspect of the decision-making process is represented by its personal dimension: the role of the judicial panel’s most prominent members (its president, the rapporteur judges and the opinion-writer) and that of law clerks.

 

LEAVE A COMMENT

Banner rivista
Archivio Working Papers
Email Subscription
Coordinamento
Andrea Buratti, Giuseppe Martinico, Oreste Pollicino, Giorgio Repetto, Raffaele Torino